Processing
01-10-2008, 11:01 PM
As someone who has been through the hiring process years ago, and a long time visitor of this website, I would say that I have a general idea of how people like to keep academy life and curriculum a guarded secret. Of course bits and pieces are discussed, but it seems as though all discussions are kept to a relatively vague level.
That said, I have to say I'm a little confused. To me, I would think it would be a positive thing to share details about academy life. Afterall, what is the total cost of bringing an applicant through the hiring process, paying for them to go to Sacramento, paying for the health insurance, having them take up a spot at the academy, and then in the end, have them realize that they don't like what they got themselves into?
Of course theirs the arguement that applicants SHOULD know what they are getting themselves into, but anyone who has been to the acdemy has seen people quit... and many times it's because they realize the life isn't for them. Think about the money and time that could have been saved had that person known what they were REALLY getting into ahead of time, and not proceeded through the process!
Same goes for curriculum. Now in this particular subject, I know we can't have every dick and jane walking around knowing CHP policy, but where's the harm in letting people in on what is being taught for general law enforcement curriculum? Any bookstore has books that cover the topics anyway, so why not let an applicant know specifically what to study ahead of time? I don't know about you, but I would know a subject alot better if I had several months to burn it into my brain rather than trying to cram it in within a few weeks. Wouldn't we all rather have someone who has really learned the background of their work, and not just picked it up on a weekend cram session? Don't see how it's cheating if you took the time to learn it. AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND KEEPING CHP POLICY UNDER TIGHT WRAPS, but general law... don't get it.
I am just thinking that if an applicant gets a full view of the life in front of them, they would be better at evauating if it's the right choice for them. I think if an applicant could start the learning process early on, they might be that much better in the future.
Please keep in mind this is opinion only. I understand that trying to do everything ahead of time can be detrimental. I think alot of people on this site have seen those people that claim to know how to shoot, and then the academy has to try and break them of their bad habits. I agree... leave some things to Sacramento... but let people in on some of the rest. Afterall, aside from this process, would many of you take a job not knowing if you were really cut out for it or without really knowing what it entailed?
Do me a favor and let me know your thoughts... but lets please try and keep this more logical, and less egotistical. thanks!!!
That said, I have to say I'm a little confused. To me, I would think it would be a positive thing to share details about academy life. Afterall, what is the total cost of bringing an applicant through the hiring process, paying for them to go to Sacramento, paying for the health insurance, having them take up a spot at the academy, and then in the end, have them realize that they don't like what they got themselves into?
Of course theirs the arguement that applicants SHOULD know what they are getting themselves into, but anyone who has been to the acdemy has seen people quit... and many times it's because they realize the life isn't for them. Think about the money and time that could have been saved had that person known what they were REALLY getting into ahead of time, and not proceeded through the process!
Same goes for curriculum. Now in this particular subject, I know we can't have every dick and jane walking around knowing CHP policy, but where's the harm in letting people in on what is being taught for general law enforcement curriculum? Any bookstore has books that cover the topics anyway, so why not let an applicant know specifically what to study ahead of time? I don't know about you, but I would know a subject alot better if I had several months to burn it into my brain rather than trying to cram it in within a few weeks. Wouldn't we all rather have someone who has really learned the background of their work, and not just picked it up on a weekend cram session? Don't see how it's cheating if you took the time to learn it. AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND KEEPING CHP POLICY UNDER TIGHT WRAPS, but general law... don't get it.
I am just thinking that if an applicant gets a full view of the life in front of them, they would be better at evauating if it's the right choice for them. I think if an applicant could start the learning process early on, they might be that much better in the future.
Please keep in mind this is opinion only. I understand that trying to do everything ahead of time can be detrimental. I think alot of people on this site have seen those people that claim to know how to shoot, and then the academy has to try and break them of their bad habits. I agree... leave some things to Sacramento... but let people in on some of the rest. Afterall, aside from this process, would many of you take a job not knowing if you were really cut out for it or without really knowing what it entailed?
Do me a favor and let me know your thoughts... but lets please try and keep this more logical, and less egotistical. thanks!!!